▲左，集合于一个形体的房间。

我们通常被要求必须拥有一个完整的居住空间，于是我们会在基地中配置上完整的体量，然后才留下类似吃剩了的空地。等待完工之后，被设计出来的那个完整居住空间往往也就因着日常生活而回归混乱状态，但住民仍能幸福地生活在其中。完整空间的基础需求似乎是个值得推敲的议题。人的生活或许并不需要如此封闭完整，开阔宽敞的空间或许也可以。

We are usually required to have a complete living space, so we will configure the complete volume in the base, and then leave the empty space

like leftovers. After waiting for completion, the designed complete living space often returns to a state of chaos due to daily life, but residents can still live happily in it. The basic need for complete space seems to be an issue worthy of scrutiny. Peoples lives may not need to be so closed and complete, and open and spacious spaces may also be fine.

▲借用日本街道的布局，将项目整体布局模拟为微缩的街道

反倒是人们总寄情于某种徜徉于自然界中的想像，渴求着某个框景下的回归自然。

这样的联想主要来自于个人最喜爱的对于自然的向往。

On the contrary, people are always attached to some kind of imagination roaming in the natural world, eager to return to nature in a certain frame. Such associations mainly come from the personal favorite yearning for nature.

▲形体的错落与对窗的借景

由西泽立卫所设计的森山宅，试图藉由虚实互换/内外反转的操作手法，让开放空间/庭院反转为完整的形状，而成为居住空间中的核心，并试图将原本就容易倾向混乱的人们的日常生活收纳在围塑这些内庭的框架之中。

望着这些庭院阅读、饮食、睡眠；

置身在这些庭园中的沐浴、暝想、呼吸。

这是一个针对以自然为重心所作的未来生活提案。

The Moriyama House designed by Ryue Nishizawa attempts to reverse the open space/courtyard into a complete shape through the op

eration method of exchanging the virtual and the real/inverting the inside and outside, and becomes the core of the living space. The daily lives of people who tend to be chaotic are contained within the framework of these inner courtyards. Looking at these gardens, reading, eating, sleeping; bathing, thinking, and breathing in these gardens. This is a proposal for future living with a focus on nature.

森山邸 建筑平面示意图

森山邸 形体轴测关系图

森山邸 活动路径分析图

森山邸 内外活动路径演示

人们对建筑物的要求很高：期望建筑物高高耸立为自己遮风挡雨；期望自己能够在建筑物中享受安逸；期望建筑物提供清澈的水源供人们饮用；期望建筑物提供新鲜的空气供人们呼吸；期望建筑物能够处理垃圾，能够为所有东西，包括所有东西，包括为工具和烤箱提供动力；人们更期望建筑物能够通过门窗，电话，邮箱把人类与外部世界连成一体；人们期望建筑物能方便自己进进出出；人们还期望花在建筑物上的维护费用不用太昂贵。

People have high requirements on buildings: they expect buildings to stand tall to protect

themselves from wind and rain; they expect them to enjoy comfort in buildings; they expect buildings to provide clear water for people to drink; they expect buildings to provide fresh air for People breathe; buildings are expected to handle trash and power everything, including tools and ovens; buildings are more expected to connect humans to the outside world through doors, windows, telephones, mailboxes; people expect Buildings are easy to get in and out of; people also expect the maintenance costs to be spent on buildings to be inexpensive.

刻意模糊了隐私与公共的界线后，人的互动反而被

在住宅空间上鼓励与外界互动，并不会真的打扰到在居住行为里真正需要隐私的地方。

反而因人的互动 增加后，彼此能在空间使用上尊重与自制，形成了无形的领域感，达成了保护隐私的需求。

同时，住居的风景也因有形的边界打破以后，与都市风景融合，都市的风 貌也会因此而多样美丽。

这都是破除隐私的构想所能得到额外且丰富的收获。

After deliberately blurring the boundaries between privacy and publicity, human interaction has been expanded. Encouraging interaction with the outside world in the residential space does not really disturb the places where privacy is really needed in the act of living. On the contrary, due to the increase of human

interaction, each other can respect and self-control in the use of space, forming an invisible sense of domain and meeting the need for privacy protection. At the same time, after the physical boundary is broken, the residential landscape will be integrated with the urban landscape, and the urban landscape will also be diverse and beautiful. These are the additional and richer benefits of the idea of breaking privacy.

Site丨Tokyocomplete

竣工年丨2005.10

Year丨2005.10

Usage丨group housingsite

Area丨290m² gross floor

Structure丨RC, steel

建筑师丨西泽立卫建筑设计事务所

Architect丨OFFICE OF RYUE NISHIZAWA

Aontractor丨Heisei Construction

西泽立卫 Ryue Nishizawa

1966年2月7日生于日本神奈川县横滨市，日本建筑师，他于 1990 年毕业于横滨国立大学，获得建筑学硕士学位。他于 1997 年成立了 Ryue Nishizawa 办公室，并在横滨国立大学担任教授。

2010年，西泽立卫及

获得建筑界最高荣誉普利兹克奖。

SANAA 组合中的S代表妹岛和世（ Sejima Kazuyo）， N代表西泽立卫（Nishizawa Ryūe），而A则寓意员工。2004年，他们合作设计出的金泽21世纪美术馆赢得了当年的威尼斯建筑双年展的金狮奖；2010年，两人又荣获象征建筑学最高荣誉的普利兹克奖。

他们既相互合作又保持独立，除了SANAA之外，他们都有独立的工作室，带领着各自进行的项目。在自己的工作室中能独扛大旗，在合作项目中又能相互配合。他们之间相互平等，但在讨论中一个思维感性飘逸，一个维持理性分析，才使得建筑在从创新之馀又不显得过于取巧。正是这样平等而辩证的合作模式，他们成为了不可代替的黄金组合。