架构师提供的文本描述。这个在布加勒斯特的项目设法在最低限度的预算下发展了一个小型的集体住房计划，提出了一种新的生活方式以及一个有争议的社区的新的城市化方法。该项目位于布加勒斯特中部地区附近，存在相当大的问题。这是一个多年来几乎没有变化的真正贫民窟，几乎被布加勒斯特政府和规划者抛弃，但就在普朗布伊塔公园(Plumbuita Park)旁边，那里有一个美丽的湖泊和一个重要的东正教修道院。从设计过程开始，我们就面临着所有这些相互矛盾的数据：一个典型的密集贫民窟，有一个(城市？)对于公共空间/私人空间/邻里来说，有时过于紧张的生活，相对于特殊自然环境的巨大潜力而言。由于这些情况，我们在设计过程中所做的决定试图解决这个矛盾的方程式。

Text description provided by the architects. This project in Bucharest manages to develop a small collective housing scheme under a minimal budget, proposing a new way of living as well as a new urbanistic approach for a controversial neighborhood. Difficult location and impossible regulations This project is located close to the central area of Bucharest in a quite problematic context. It is a genuine slum almost unchanged over the years, almost abandoned by the Bucharest’s administration and planners, but located right next to the Plumbuita Park, which has a beautiful lake and an important Orthodox monastery. Since the beginning of the design process, we faced all these conflicting data: a typical dense slum plot, with an (urban?) life that sometimes bursts too intense for what a public space / private space / neighborhood should be, versus the huge potential of an exceptional natural environment. Due to these circumstances, the decisions we took during the design attempted to solve this paradoxical equation.

 © Cosmin Dragomir

c.Cosmin Dragomi

当业主(一位年轻的女士)决定投资282平方米的地块时，这个项目的故事就开始了。最初，市政厅规划师的建议是一个城市解决方案，说明了布加勒斯特专用旅店的一个冷漠的复制品。但对于这样的土地，开放6.6米，长度42米，这将意味着损害任何关系，与一个可能的庭院，以及一个完全没有功能的建筑，不可能发展，然后，出售。

The project story begins when the owner (a young lady) decides to invest on a plot of 282 sqm. Initially, the City Hall planner’s proposal was an urban solution illustrating an indifferent replica of the Bucharest specific wagon-house. But for such a land, with the opening of 6.6 m and length of 42 m, that would mean compromising any relationship with a possible courtyard as well as a completely non-functional building, impossible to develop and, later on, to sale.

 © Cosmin Dragomir

c.Cosmin Dragomi

首先，我们提出的建议是一个根本性的类型学上的改变：从城市旅店，到一个由两卷独立的书组成的方案。因此，在不改变区域密度，即保持当地城市密度参数不变的情况下，这种新的类型学选择来自于建筑面积的重新分布，而不是水平方向。通过这一操作，我们获得了更小的足迹，从而产生了更紧凑的体积，每一个都有一个更大的庭院。尽管更传统和更高，这两卷肯定比最初的单卷旅行车房的功能更好。4x30米可能是。此外，这两卷建立了适当的关系，他们的庭院面积。通过使用土地的全部宽度，这些庭院的比例允许地面组织所有必要的停车场，而不需要地下停车，因此也不需要地下室层，这对如此小的投资具有所有的经济影响。

First of all, the proposal we made was a radical typological change: from the urban wagon-house, to a scheme composed by 2 separate volumes. Therefore, without changing the density of the area, that is, keeping unchanged the local urban density parameters, this new typological choice came from the redistribution of the built areas rather on vertical than on the horizontal direction. With this operation we obtained a smaller footprint, resulting in more compact volumes each with a larger courtyard. Even though more conventional and higher, these two volumes are certainly more functional than the initial single volume wagon-house of approx. 4 x 30 m might have been. Moreover, the two volumes establish a proper relationship with their courtyards area. By using the full width of the land, the proportions of these courtyards allowed the ground organization of all necessary parking places, without the need for underground parking and thereby a basement level with all its economical implications for such a small investment.

 © Cosmin Dragomir

c.Cosmin Dragomi

最后，这一类型的变化意味着要成为该地区潜在的试点干预措施，以鼓励更有效的未来城市形态。这可能会导致吸引类似投资的积极(但不是异乎寻常的)情景，或许这将有助于普朗布伊塔的城市贫民窟摆脱目前正处于的社会-城市崩溃。在体积和功能方面，这两个块几乎是相同的。唯一显著的区别是，第一个街区的底层，离街道更近，有一个通往庭院的过道通道，第二个街区位于地势的深处。除第一层的一楼外，两座大厦的每一层均有一间卧室，面积约为一间。68平方米总共有7套公寓。

Finally, this typological change is meant to be a potential pilot intervention of the area, in order to encourage a more efficient future urban morphology. This could result in a positive (but not utopical) scenario of attracting similar investments, and perhaps it will help the urban slums of Plumbuita in getting out of the socio-urban collapse, which is presently in. In volumetric and functional terms, the two blocks are almost identical. The only notable difference is that the ground floor of the first block, that stands closer to the street, leaves a gangway access toward the courtyard and the second block that’s located in the depth of the plot. Except the ground floor of the first one, each level of the two blocks contains 1 bedroom apartment with a built area of approx. 68 sqm. That is, a total of 7 apartments.

 © Cosmin Dragomir

c.Cosmin Dragomi

表现力和材料的一般表现力是出于两个原因而被选择的。第一个是实用的：考虑到两套公寓之间的距离很小(10米)，因此需要保护公寓的隐私。第二个原因是处理垂直的木材栅栏图案，这种模式在贫民窟中随处可见。此外，还选择了垂直百叶窗(附在钢框架上的局部着色松木板)，与水平百叶窗相比，其维修效果更好。

Expression and materials The general expression of the facades was chosen for two reasons. The first is a practical one: the need to protect the privacy of the apartments, given the small distance (10 m) between two apartments located across or between the building and its neighbors. The second reason resulted from processing the vertical timber fence pattern, which is omnipresent in the context of the slums. Also, the vertical louvers (local stained pine slats attached to steel frames) were chosen for their better maintenance, compared to the horizontal ones.

 © Cosmin Dragomir

c.Cosmin Dragomi

如前所述，所涉及的材料和技术使这一小规模投资取得了成效。采用了传统的建筑体系(砌体和钢筋混凝土框架)，简单的饰面和技术解决方案。这个项目的主要目标是对我们来说，是对上下文需求的适当回答，也是对我们年轻客户的需求的适当回答。然而，这涉及到试图提供一个通用的例子，说明如何在矛盾但模拟的背景下聪明地建造，因为它是布加勒斯特的传统贫民窟。

As already said, the materials and technologies involved have pursued the effectiveness of this small investment. There were used traditional construction systems (masonry and reinforced concrete frames) simple finishes and technical solutions. The main goal of this project was for us the appropriate answer to the context demands, but also to our young client’s needs. However, this involved an attempt to provide a generic example of how to build intelligently within a contradictory but simulative context, as it is the traditional Bucharest slums.

 © Cosmin Dragomir

c.Cosmin Dragomi