Brutopia stekke + fraas

2015-06-12 20:00

架构师提供的文本描述。布鲁塞尔的一群居民联合起来，共同建设布鲁托邦(Brutopia)，这是一个大规模的合作项目。他们的重点是持久性、繁荣、生态和社会多样性。

Text description provided by the architects. A group of residents of Brussels teamed up and worked together to build Brutopia, a large scale cohousing project. Their focus was set on durability, prosperity, ecology and social diversity.

 © Tim Van de Velde

c.Tim Van de Velde

这个新的建筑项目，距离当代艺术中心Wiels仅一箭之遥，由两卷书组成，由一个大的共享花园连接起来。布鲁托邦有29个公寓、一些商业空间和一个当地的服务中心。结果是在工作中生活的混合体。“星球”、“人民”、“繁荣”和“参与”的主题贯穿于这个创新的综合体中。

The new building project, within a stone’s throw of the contemporary art centre Wiels, exists out of 2 volumes, connected by a large shared garden. Brutopia exists out of 29 apartements, some business spaces and a local service centre. The result is a mix of living en working. The themes ‘planet’, ‘people’, ‘prosperity’ and ‘participation’ are threaded through this innovative complex.

 First Floor Plan

一层平面图

地球：可持续性

Planet: sustainability

她之所以选择这个地点，是因为她与一般的公共交通设施有着良好的联系。此外，还建立了大型自行车停车场，居民建立了汽车共享系统。在这29套公寓中，27套被认为是“被动”住房，另外2套被认为是“极低能耗”住房。七个住宅是零能量实体。屋顶设有雨水调理系统和太阳能电池板。2009年，Brutopia获得了布鲁塞尔环境公司发布的“示范建筑”价格。2013年，Brutopia赢得了可持续和负担得起的住房的蓝色房价。

The site was chosen because of her good connection to general public transport facilities. Besides this, a large scale bicycle parking has been created and the inhabitants have set up a car sharing system. Out of the 29 apartments, 27 are considered as ‘passive’ housing and the 2 others as ‘very-low energy’ housing. Seven dwellings are zero energy entities. The roofs are provided with rainwater recuperation systems and solar panels. In 2009, Brutopia got the ‘example building’ price, that has been handed out by Brussels Environment. In 2013, Brutopia won the blue house price for sustainable and affordable housing.

 © Tim Van de Velde

c.Tim Van de Velde

人民：多样性

People: diversity

年轻人和养老金领取者都聚集在布鲁托邦。在语言、收入和职业方面也存在多样性。此外，整个大楼还可供行动不便的人使用。该项目确实为建筑物的居民创造了一个与邻里居民一样的聚会场所的居住环境。除其他外，还有共同的花园、共用的洗衣房、共用的多功能空间等…。与邻里的联系因设有营业空间和本地老人服务中心而得到加强。

Both, young adults and pensioners come together in Brutopia. Diversity is also present in terms of language, income and occupation. Furthermore the whole building has been made accessible for persons with reduced mobility. The project really creates a dwelling environment full of meeting places for the inhabitants of the building just like inhabitants of the neighbourhood. There is, among others, a common garden, a shared laundry room, a shared multifunctional space, etc… The connection with the neighbourhood is strengthened by the presence of business spaces and a service centre for local elderly.

 © Tim Van de Velde

c.Tim Van de Velde

布鲁托邦的居民联合起来，完成了一个“古典”开发者的任务。对大多数参与者来说，这种合作使他们能够继续生活在首都。不同的公寓有不同的表面和适应的经济价值，所以潜水员一群人可以在这个项目中移动。这些公寓以空壳的形式交付，使每个人都能够根据自己的能力建立自己的公寓。这一想法使扩大居民群体再次成为可能。

The inhabitants of Brutopia joined together to implement themselves the tasks of a ‘classical’ developer. This collaboration made it, for most of the participants, possible to continue living in the capital city. The different apartments have variable surfaces and an adapted economical value, so that a divers group of people could move in the project. The apartments were delivered as empty shells which made it possible for everyone to establish their apartment according to there capabilities. The idea made it again possible to broaden the group of inhabitants.

 © Tim Van de Velde

c.Tim Van de Velde

Participation

整个建筑过程都是以参与式方式进行的，这一概念在居住期间仍在实践。所有的居民，都有自己的具体竞争，完成了自己的角色，通常是致力于一个开发商。因此，他们创立了一个非营利组织，由一个大会、一个管理委员会和一个理事会组成。

The whole building process has been driven in a participatory way and this concept is still practiced during the habitation. The inhabitants, all having there own specific competitions, accomplished themselves the role that normally is dedicated to a developer. Therefore they initiated a non profit organisation provided with a general assembly, a management board and a governing board.

 © Tim Van de Velde

c.Tim Van de Velde

为了确保项目的民主运作和可行性，成立了不同的工作组，涉及与建筑项目有关的所有不同主题(社区、财政、补贴、建筑工地、…)。。这一由独立工作组组成的结构使得有可能将任务分配给确保整个群体参与的不同(未来)居民。

With a view to the democratic functioning and the viability of the project different working groups were set up involving all the different subjects related to the building project (community, finances, subsidies, construction site,…). This structure with independent working groups made it possible to attribute tasks to the different (future) inhabitants which insured involvement of the whole group.