© Fernando Gomulya

c.Fernando Gomulya

架构师提供的文本描述。建筑在其环境中能成为一种批判吗？建筑在邻里能成为对立面吗？建筑能解构有形的建筑吗？然后再质疑生活的本质？

Text description provided by the architects. Can an architecture be a critique in its environment? Can an architecturebe an antithesis in its neighborhood? Can an architecture deconstruct a physical establishment? Then re-question the essence of living?

 © Fernando Gomulya

c.Fernando Gomulya

这座小房子位于庞多克因达区的8mx20m地段。虽然它是一个封闭的社区的一部分，这座建筑位于小河的边缘，与独立的(城市)村庄定居在河对面。南雅加达的庞多克因达是一个居民区/门禁社区，它确实是在80年代成功建造的。从那以后，庞多克·因达一直是一种象征性的地位。雅加达一些最成功的国会议员，以及一些来自其他地区的名人，都觉得在这一地区有一所房子是必须的。这些成功的象征，除了它所处的位置外，通常用它的建筑语言来表现。例如，一些类似于意大利或法国的结构柱-其表面是人造的。这些支柱显示出成功。为了回答这个问题，我开始质疑房主是否还需要这些符号，反之亦然？事实证明，她同意通过解构这一共同的话语来打破这种局面，把整个房子倾斜成几乎倒塌的东西。

This small house is located on 8mx20m lot in Pondok Indah district. Although it is a part of a gated community, this building islocated on the edge of small river, with indigeneous (urban) village settlementsright across the river. Pondok Indah in South Jakarta is a residential area/gated community which is indeed successfully built in the 80’s. Since then until this moment, Pondok Indah is being a symbolic status. Some of the most successful parliament member in Jakarta as well as some celebrities who come from other regions feel like it is a must to have a house in this area. These symbols of success, aside from where it is located, generally showed by its architecture language. For instance, some structural columns which similar as it is in Italy or France – with its artificial face. These pillars show a success. To answer this challenge, I start to question the homeowner whether she still needs those symbols or vice versa? It turns out that she agrees to demolish this situation by deconstructing this common discourse, tilting the whole house to be something that almost fall down.

 Floor Plan

 © Fernando Gomulya

c.Fernando Gomulya

这是一个极端的对立。建筑师有权自由观察环境，并对这一建议作出反应。这座房子还与印度尼西亚音乐家艾哈迈德·达尼(Ahmad Dhani)在隔壁。达尼的房子漆成了黑色，而这座房子全是白色的。这种无意中的巧合加强了鲁马林(Slanted House)作为一种建筑，批评其环境。建筑作为其环境中的一种批判手段。

It is an extreme antithesis. Architects is given a discretion to observe the environment and react with this proposal. This house is also next door with one of the Indonesian musician, Ahmad Dhani. Dhani’s house is painted all black whereas this house is all white. This unintentionally coincidence reinforce RumahMiring(Slanted House) as an architecture which criticize its environment. Architecture as a critique device in its environment.

 © Fernando Gomulya

c.Fernando Gomulya

 Floor Plan

 © Fernando Gomulya

c.Fernando Gomulya

房子的房间功能采用了一个新的顺序，公共区域放在第一层，它由一个储藏室、书房区和一个游泳池组成。第二层的功能更多的私人房间，如主卧室，衣柜和主浴室。16平方米的浴室面积是对当前城市生活方式趋势的回应，后者通常会花更多的时间在浴室里，在那里，用户可以有更多安静的时间，一个沉思的房间，以及一个休息的地方，同时使用智能手机、报纸或社交媒体作为交流设备。

The room function of the house uses a new sequence where the public area is placed on the first Level, it is consist of a pantry, study area and a swimming pool. Second level is functioned for more private rooms such as a master bedroom, wardrobe and master bathroom. The 16m2 bathroom area acts as a response to the current trend of urban lifestyle who normally spend more time in a bathroom where users are able to have more quiet time, a contemplative room as well as a resting place while using smartphones, reading newspaper or social media as a communication device.

顶层用于休息室和客房。在建筑部分，我们可以看到和定义私人区域位于中间，就像一个夹在更多公共区域之间的三明治。

The top level is used for a lounge and a guest room. In the building section, we can see and define that the private area is put in the middle, like a sandwich between the more public areas.

 © Fernando Gomulya

c.Fernando Gomulya

 Floor Plan

 © Fernando Gomulya

c.Fernando Gomulya

整个建筑依靠钢结构作为现代住宅的代表，这取决于建造。正方形框架现在被认为是不稳定的象征，是对周围既定状况的解构。

The whole building relies on the steel structure as a representative of a modern housing which depends on fabrication. The square framework is now agreed to be slanted as a symbol of instability, a deconstruction of an established situation around.

 © Fernando Gomulya

c.Fernando Gomulya